Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 global score. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 3 construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the TCL 10 5G UW, even though it was released 7 years before.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better looking display than TCL 10 5G UW, although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a quite smaller screen. TCL 10 5G UW has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and 4 more processing cores.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW features a much better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a larger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a much better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 41 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.