Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is way better than TCL 10 5G UW, having an 88.3 score against 73.5. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S10's construction is way lighter and thinner than the TCL 10 5G UW, although it was released just a bit over a year before.
The Galaxy S10 has a little better processing power than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a greater screen pixel density.
TCL 10 5G UW has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.