Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW, getting a global score of 79.5 against 73.5. The Galaxy S7 is an extremely older device than TCL 10 5G UW, but Samsung was able to make it extremely lighter and somewhat thinner. TCL 10 5G UW features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a sharper screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. TCL 10 5G UW has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The TCL 10 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
TCL 10 5G UW features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.