Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than TCL 10 5G UW's overall score of 73.5. The Galaxy S7 Active is an a lot older and a little thicker phone than the TCL 10 5G UW, but Samsung was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. TCL 10 5G UW features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a better display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density. TCL 10 5G UW captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
TCL 10 5G UW features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S7 Active is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.