Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting an 81.7 score against 73.5. Even though Galaxy S8 is incredibly older than TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a little sharper display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a greater display pixel density.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM memory. TCL 10 5G UW shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 megapixels resolution.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 5G UW also has more internal memory capacity. TCL 10 5G UW features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S8 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.