Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than TCL 10 5G UW, having an 80.1 score against 73.5. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features and a performance increase. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an a lot thicker and heavier cellphone than TCL 10 5G UW.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than TCL 10 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The TCL 10 5G UW features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime is very similar to TCL 10 5G UW's battery life.
TCL 10 5G UW features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the TCL 10 5G UW. If you want to save some money, you can get the TCL 10 5G UW, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.