Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is better than TCL 10 5G UW, with an 81 score against 73.5. Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, a bit thicker and a little heavier device than the TCL 10 5G UW. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and TCL 10 5G UW have very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel count in each inch in the display.
TCL 10 5G UW has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The TCL 10 5G UW has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
TCL 10 5G UW captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover Pro costs a bit more money than the TCL 10 5G UW, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.