Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZs has a global score of 77.2, which is slightly better than TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 score. Even though Sony Xperia XZs is way older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's body is much lighter and somewhat thinner. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 5G UW and the Sony Xperia XZs feature very similar screens, because although the Sony Xperia XZs has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels per inch in the display. TCL 10 5G UW has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Xperia XZs, and although they both have an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 128 GB internal storage.
Sony Xperia XZs shoots much clearer pictures and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, although it has a tinier aperture, a much less mega pixels back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution. The TCL 10 5G UW features a superior battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZs is a better device, it is way more expensive than TCL 10 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the TCL 10 5G UW. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Xperia XZs, else you can save some dollars and get the TCL 10 5G UW, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.