Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the TCL 10 5G UW's 73.5 general score. Xperia Z4v's design is much lighter and just a little bit thinner than TCL 10 5G UW, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Xperia Z4v has the previous 5.1 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a little better performance than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Xperia Z4v features a better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a little bit better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a lot more mega-pixels camera and a bigger diafragm aperture. The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Sony Xperia Z4v is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.