Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-29 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW's score of 73.5. Although Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is older than the TCL 10 5G UW, it's construction is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features and some performance improvements.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. TCL 10 5G UW counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.