Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-29 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has an overall score of 77.5, which is just a bit better than TCL 10 5G UW's score of 73.5. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 design is thinner than TCL 10 5G UW, but it is a little heavier and was released 4 years before. The TCL 10 5G UW features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite bigger display and a quite better pixels quantity in each inch in the display. TCL 10 5G UW shoots better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has better battery lifetime than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.