Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than TCL 10 5G UW's score of 73.5. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and TCL 10 5G UW were only released 6 months apart, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is just a bit heavier but a bit thinner than TCL 10 5G UW.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than TCL 10 5G UW. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little more vivid display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
TCL 10 5G UW features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much better camera than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better battery performance than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.