Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X2 is slightly better than TCL 10 5G UW, having a overall score of 79.3 against 73.5. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco X2 has a more recent 11 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version. Even when the Xiaomi Poco X2 and the TCL 10 5G UW were only released with a couple of months difference, the Xiaomi Poco X2 is just a little bit lighter and a bit thinner.
TCL 10 5G UW counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. TCL 10 5G UW has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The TCL 10 5G UW has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a slightly better camera than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X2 has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the TCL 10 5G UW one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.