Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is much better than TCL 10 5G UW, getting a general score of 81.6 against 73.5. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should give very similar operating system features. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's construction has the same thickness than TCL 10 5G UW, but it is a little bit heavier.
The TCL 10 5G UW and the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC feature similar processors, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a little bit better display than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures just a bit better videos and photos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
TCL 10 5G UW features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB, the TCL 10 5G UW also has 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a little better battery lifetime than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.