Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-29 | -- |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Diamond gray | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than the TCL 10 5G UW, having an 86.1 score against 73.5. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version while TCL 10 5G UW has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features and enhanced performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the TCL 10 5G UW.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a bit larger screen, a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 5G UW. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro captures a bit better videos and photos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The TCL 10 5G UW counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 5G UW also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.