Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-29 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Diamond gray | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an overall score of 81.1, which is better than TCL 10 5G UW's general score of 73.5. Even when Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and TCL 10 5G UW were released only 6 months apart, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you the same operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's CPU is very similar to the processor in TCL 10 5G UW, both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. The TCL 10 5G UW features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count in each inch of display.
The TCL 10 5G UW has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than TCL 10 5G UW, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than TCL 10 5G UW, because it has a 12% greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.