Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Ember gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 72.1. IPhone X's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the TCL 10 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. The Apple iPhone X has a more powerful processor than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
TCL 10 Pro and Apple iPhone X count with extremely similar displays, because although the Apple iPhone X has much less brightness and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a quite better pixel number per display inch. The Apple iPhone X features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
TCL 10 Pro has a very superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a camera with much more MP.
The Apple iPhone X is a lot more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.