Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is better than the TCL 10 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 72.1. Even though the Google Pixel is noticeably older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's design is just a little thinner and lighter. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger display.
TCL 10 Pro features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. TCL 10 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 256 GB.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 64 percent bigger battery capacity. TCL 10 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited situations, a way larger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Google Pixel not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.