Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is better than the TCL 10 Pro, having a general score of 82.5 against 72.1. Google Pixel 2 XL is an notably older phone than TCL 10 Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter anyway. TCL 10 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a much lower pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The TCL 10 Pro has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
TCL 10 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 29% more battery capacity. TCL 10 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.