Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is better than the TCL 10 Pro's general score of 72.1. The Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than the TCL 10 Pro, but Google was able to build it somewhat thinner and extremely lighter anyway. TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster CPU than TCL 10 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The TCL 10 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a way more megapixels camera.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage. TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.