Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a 78.8 score against 72.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features and some performance improvements. The Google Pixel 3a design is thinner and notably lighter than the TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released about 13 months before.
TCL 10 Pro has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the TCL 10 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen.
The TCL 10 Pro features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. TCL 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
TCL 10 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.