Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Ember gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's score of 72.1. Even when Google Pixel 4 and TCL 10 Pro were only released with a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 4 is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. TCL 10 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
TCL 10 Pro counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB and more internal memory. The TCL 10 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 63 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.