Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Ember gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 72.1. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is a little bit heavier but thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and they were released only a couple months apart. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. TCL 10 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
TCL 10 Pro features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage. TCL 10 Pro has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 23% bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs more money than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.