Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ember gray | Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than TCL 10 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 72.1. The Google Pixel 4a is a a lot lighter and thinner cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, even though both were released only a few months apart. These devices have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little larger display. Google Pixel 4a has a bit better processing power than TCL 10 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
TCL 10 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The TCL 10 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 45 percent bigger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also cheap compared to the TCL 10 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.