Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Ember gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a lot better than the TCL 10 Pro's score of 72.1. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and TCL 10 Pro were released with only a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processor than TCL 10 Pro. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.