Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Ember gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than TCL 10 Pro, with an 89 score against 72.1. The Google Pixel 5 construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than TCL 10 Pro, although they were released with only 5 months difference. TCL 10 Pro features a bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a quite larger display.
The Google Pixel 5 features a little bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
TCL 10 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 costs more money than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.