Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Ember gray | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Titanium |
| $ 400.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 396 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than TCL 10 Pro, with a 92.1 score against 72.1. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but a lot heavier than TCL 10 Pro. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has newer 14 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features and improved performance.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better looking screen than TCL 10 Pro, because it has much more brightness, a higher resolution of 1280 x 2800, a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher pixels density.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 896 GB more internal memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design captures a bit better pictures and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features greater battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 23 percent larger battery size.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.