Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 396 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.4 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is slightly better than TCL 10 Pro, with a 77.7 score against 72.1. These devices come with Android OS, but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact HTC One M9 is much older and a bit thicker than TCL 10 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more vivid screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. HTC One M9 features a bit better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processor.
The TCL 10 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. TCL 10 Pro features a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs, a camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video.
TCL 10 Pro has a very superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
The HTC One M9 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.