Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, having a 77 score against 72.1. Despite of the fact that the LG G7 Fit is older than TCL 10 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 Fit has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, offering a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
LG G7 Fit counts with just a bit better looking display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, more pixels per display inch and a little bit brighter screen. TCL 10 Pro has a little better processing power than LG G7 Fit, because it has 4 more processing cores (but slower) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The TCL 10 Pro features just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 10 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 52% bigger battery size.
TCL 10 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images, a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.