Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8 ThinQ has a score of 84.3, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 score. The LG G8 ThinQ design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the TCL 10 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released only 13 months before. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, providing some nice extra features and improved performance.
LG G8 ThinQ has a bit superior processor than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. LG G8 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and much darker display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a greater pixels amount per screen inch.
The TCL 10 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
LG G8 ThinQ features a much better memory to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G8 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The TCL 10 Pro counts with greater battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG G8 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.