Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Ember gray | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a score of 85.4 against 72.1. The LG K92 construction is a little bit thinner but a little bit heavier than TCL 10 Pro, and both were released only a couple months apart. These devices have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
The LG K92's processing unit is just as good as the TCL 10 Pro one, both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and 8 cores. The TCL 10 Pro has a more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
TCL 10 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than LG K92, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 64 mega pixels, the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG K92 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. TCL 10 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 14% more battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG K92 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.