Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-07-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.87 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.15 ounces |
| Ember gray | Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Q8 is just a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro, with a 77.2 score against 72.1. Even though the LG Q8 is notably older than TCL 10 Pro, it's design is thinner and notably lighter. Both devices in this review come with Android OS, but the LG Q8 has 7.0 Nougat version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG Q8, because it has 2 GB more RAM and more cores (although they are slower). LG Q8 counts with a bit more vivid display than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and much more opaque screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater display pixels density.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG Q8, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The TCL 10 Pro features a greater camera than LG Q8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery life than LG Q8, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.