Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ember gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 82.5 against 72.1. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version. Although LG V30S ThinQ is much older than TCL 10 Pro, it's construction is lighter and thinner.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The TCL 10 Pro has a little sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. TCL 10 Pro has a much better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4550mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
TCL 10 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the TCL 10 Pro. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the TCL 10 Pro, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.