Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 global score. LG V35 ThinQ's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than TCL 10 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a lot lesser pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen. LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger memory for games and applications than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
TCL 10 Pro takes way better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
TCL 10 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 38 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.