Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Ember gray | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 score. Although LG V60 ThinQ and TCL 10 Pro were released only 2 months apart, the LG V60 ThinQ construction is a little thinner but somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
TCL 10 Pro has a bit better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. TCL 10 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ. They have a same size sensor, a same size aperture, the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and a back-facing camera with a 64 megapixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ features just a little better battery lifetime than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.