Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a lot better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Even when the LG Velvet and the TCL 10 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the LG Velvet is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner. LG Velvet features a bit more powerful processing unit than TCL 10 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. TCL 10 Pro has a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG Velvet features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.