Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Ember gray | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 general score. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is newer and much thinner than the TCL 10 Pro's, although it is also a lot heavier. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
TCL 10 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a way smaller display, and they both have the same display pixel density, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a little bit brighter display. The TCL 10 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the TCL 10 Pro also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has 2 GB more RAM. TCL 10 Pro has a little better battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
The TCL 10 Pro features a very superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs more than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.