Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ember gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is way better than TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user all the same OS features. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, Motorola edge's body is just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than TCL 10 Pro.
Motorola edge counts with a little faster processor than TCL 10 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a brighter display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola edge counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. TCL 10 Pro features a little better battery performance than Motorola edge, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Motorola edge's camera is just as good as TCL 10 Pro's camera, they have a same size diafragm aperture, a 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the same sensor size, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Motorola edge costs more money than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.