Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Ember gray | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is better than the TCL 10 Pro, having an 80.9 score against 72.1. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a notably newer and a little thinner device than TCL 10 Pro, although it is just a little heavier. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has newer 12 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in TCL 10 Pro, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display, a brighter screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The TCL 10 Pro features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better camera than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
TCL 10 Pro features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.