Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ember gray | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 has a score of 77.2, which is just a bit better than TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 has the newer 13 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, giving some nice extra features and performance improvements. Motorola Edge 40 is a much newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than the TCL 10 Pro.
TCL 10 Pro has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 and TCL 10 Pro both count with extremely similar displays, and although the Motorola Edge 40 has a just a little greater pixel density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more brightness, they both have a screen with the same size.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images and a way tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
TCL 10 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 40, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.