Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Ember gray | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 83.4 against 72.1. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a much newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than TCL 10 Pro, but it is just a little heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has newer 13 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, offering lots of additional features.
The TCL 10 Pro features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less brightness, a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 50 mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a way better video resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.