Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ember gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting an 81.9 score against 72.1. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is a lot newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than the TCL 10 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features and improved performance.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more display brightness, a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4550mAh battery size.
The TCL 10 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.