Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the TCL 10 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 72.1. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, giving some extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the TCL 10 Pro.
TCL 10 Pro features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, way more brightness and a little larger display.
TCL 10 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos and a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The TCL 10 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.