Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Ember gray | Surfing blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 82.6 against 72.1. Moto G 5G Plus's body is just a little bit heavier but a bit thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a bit smaller screen and a quite worse screen density. TCL 10 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 744 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a little better battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.