Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Ember gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is better than the TCL 10 Pro, with an 86.2 score against 72.1. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the TCL 10 Pro, although it's a bit heavier. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, giving you a couple nice extra features.
The TCL 10 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. The Moto G200 5G features a little faster CPU than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
TCL 10 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro has a slightly better camera than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little longer battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4550mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.