Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is a bit better than TCL 10 Pro, with a 75.8 score against 72.1. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, so it offers a lot of extra features. Moto Z Force's construction is lighter and noticeably thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
The TCL 10 Pro features a little better performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM. TCL 10 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot worse pixel quantity per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The TCL 10 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a back camera with a much better resolution. Moto Z Force counts with a better storage for apps and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
TCL 10 Pro counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Moto Z Force is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.