Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ember gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 400.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition is a little bit better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a 77.4 score against 72.1. Despite of the fact that the Moto Z2 Force Edition is notably older than TCL 10 Pro, it's design is noticeably lighter and a lot thinner. The TCL 10 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way lower display density, it also counts with a larger display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
TCL 10 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments and a way higher 64 MP resolution camera.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the TCL 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as TCL 10 Pro. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the TCL 10 Pro, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.