Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Ember gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Although Motorola Moto Z3 is older than TCL 10 Pro, it's body is notably thinner and lighter. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10, giving a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
TCL 10 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit lower pixels count per inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Moto Z3 has a bit superior processor than TCL 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The TCL 10 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and videos, a back facing camera with way more MP and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a greater memory for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. TCL 10 Pro features a superior battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 52% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola Moto Z3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.