Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Ember gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 Play has a score of 76.3, which is just a bit better than TCL 10 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Even though the Moto Z3 Play is older than the TCL 10 Pro, it's body is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter. TCL 10 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro has a much better display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little larger screen. Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and a way more MP back-facing camera.
TCL 10 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
The Moto Z3 Play is more expensive than TCL 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.