Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Ember gray | Oxford blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is much better than TCL 10 Pro's score of 72.1. The Motorola One 5G construction is a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and they were only released 4 months apart. Motorola One 5G has a bit better CPU than TCL 10 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One 5G, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola One 5G counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity. The TCL 10 Pro has a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Motorola One 5G is also cheaper than the TCL 10 Pro, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.